When OpenSignal issued its latest State of LTE report today, it again showed that South Korea and Japan lead the world in actual 4G LTE availability: In July to September, a Korean 4G smartphone was on 4G 96% of time whereas a Japanese 4G smartphone was on 4G 92% of time.
These figures are impressive and come as a result of significant operator investments to cover populated areas – also indoors.
“Many of Western Europe’s biggest economies are languishing below the 60% mark, including France, Germany, Italy and the U.K.”
Snip from OpenSignal’s map – the darker the higher 4G availability.
The graphs below compare the 4G availability in Europe as reported by OpenSignal (left) to the country population (right). Click to enlarge.
The European country with the highest 4G availability is Lithuania with 85% (#3 globally) followed by the Netherlands with 84% (#5 globally).
In the graphs we have highlighted the five largest countries in Europe, normally referred to as EU5, in blue. With the exception of Spain, they are cluttering in the lower part of the left-hand chart.
The citizens of the most populated countries in Europe tend to have the worst 4G availability
Logically it should be the other way around: It should make more sense to invest in countries where the number of customers – and thereby revenue – is high.
But maybe the EU5 countries are geographically larger? Let’s replace the previous right-hand graph with the population density.
The high level of 4G coverage in the Netherlands (second from the top) can partly be explained by Europe’s highest population density. But EU5 members Italy, Germany and the UK are also among the countries with the highest population density in Europe – yet they have low 4G availability.
In contrast, half of the countries in the European top 10 of 4G coverage – Lithuania, Norway, Sweden, Finland and Latvia – all have very low population density.
An attempt to correlate the 4G availability with the number of networks per country didn’t give anything. To exemplify, Norway is in the 4G coverage top with only two commercial networks. Netherlands in also in the top but has four networks – the same number as bottom-ranked France and Italy. There’s no support for the claim that consolidation would increase investments – and no support for the opposite.
Until we find a better explanation, we have to attribute the position of the EU5 countries to a lack of ambition – by the operators or the policymakers. When it comes to Italy and the UK this lack of ambition could be explained by planned mergers causing operators to “wait and see” before investing. (As we know, the merger in the UK between ‘3’ and O2 wasn’t approved whereas the merger in Italy between ‘3’ and Wind was).
Tefficient’s data usage analysis (soon to be updated with 1H 2016) shows that the EU5 countries are found in the low-usage tier of Europe:
The question is: Is the usage low because of low 4G coverage? Or is the 4G coverage low because of low usage?